(732) 988-5362|bburns@praxislegalsolutions.com
Praxis Legal Solutions - Lawyer & Legal Services in NJ

Praxis Legal Solutions

Client focused. Solution oriented.

  • Home
  • About
  • Areas of Practice
    • Contract Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Employment Law
    • Litigation Management
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Contact Praxis
  • Payment Form

Business
Law

Business
Transactions

Contracts

Employment
Law

Legal
Services

Copyrights and
Trademarks

The Case of the Dancing Baby

September 29, 2015 by Barbara Burns Leave a Comment

In 2008, Stephanie Lenz posted a video to YouTube of her toddler son dancing to a tune by the artist formerly, and once again, known as Prince.  The tune was Let’s Go Crazy, and the video was titled “Let’s Go Crazy #1”.

The Case of the Dancing Baby

Universal Music Group issued a takedown notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”), asserting that the use of Let’s Go Crazy was “not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent or the law”.  Those last three little words would prove to be a big problem for Universal; a problem that lasted for eight years and ended when the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Lenz.

Lenz filed a counter notice, claiming that Universal failed to consider whether her use of Let’s Go Crazy was permissible under “the law”; the law in this case being the fair use exception under the Copyright Act.  Much litigation ensued, the end result of which was a finding by the court that Universal did not give due consideration to Lenz’s claim of fair use.

Fair UseFair Use Exception

“Fair use” is the use of copyrighted material for a “limited and transformative” purpose, such as comment, criticism or parody.  Lenz’s use of the Prince tune could be characterized as either comment or parody, as it was clearly not intended as a substitute for the Prince tune, and, as such, would not have infringed Prince’s right to profit from his creation.

The Dancing Baby case is important for the owners of copyrighted material, whether musical, literary or graphical, because it makes explicit the obligation of a copyright owner, or the owner’s agent, to make a good faith, subjective judgment as to whether the use of copyrighted material is within the fair use exception.  A mere assertion is not enough; nor will an argument that “fair use” is an affirmative defense.

The Ruling on Dancing Baby Case

The Dancing Baby case is important as well for anyone who wishes to claim a fair use exception.  The Ninth Circuit did not define the parameters of a good faith, subjective judgment; its holding was that whether a use is a fair use is an issue of fact to be determined by a jury.  The ruling in the Dancing Baby case cuts both ways.  The owners of copyrighted material must form a subjective judgment, considering the totality of the circumstances, as to whether a use is a fair use.  Similarly, those who would make use of copyrighted material under the fair use exception must take care to ensure that the use is indeed “limited and transformative”.  Parodying the lyrics of Let’s Go Crazy would arguably make the cut; uploading your acappella performance of Let’s Go Crazy, or using a recording of Vladimir Horowitz playing Mozart as background music on your website would most definitely not.

Music, photos and graphics are available online in abundance, seemingly there for the taking.  But because you can, does not mean that you may.  If you have questions, or would like more information about fair use or the DMCA, you can contact me at your convenience.

Need expert legal advice and counsel for your business?

Schedule a consultation with Praxis Legal Solutions

Related Posts

  • Employment Law New JerseyResponsibility to Temporary Employees Under State and Federal Laws
  • Buy/Sell Agreements FAQsBuy/Sell Agreements FAQs
  • Drafting an Operating Agreement- Five Things to Think AboutDrafting an Operating Agreement- Five Things to Think About
  • Trademarks & Copyright Attorney NJTrademark Law – The Basics
  • Moving to the Cloud ComputingMoving to the Cloud? Think Before You Move.
  • Nonprofit Corporations:  The BasicsNonprofit Corporations:  The Basics

Filed Under: Copyrights and Trademarks, Fair Use

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like..

  • copyrightCopyright and Trademark Symbols
  • copyrightCopyright – The Basics
  • Designs as Trademarks?
  • Google TrademarkAdwords and Trademarks
  • CDAThird Party Content on Your Website

News Update

Recent Posts

  • Contract Law – Understanding the Basics
  • New Jersey Bans Salary History
  • Earned Sick Leave Is Mandatory In New Jersey
  • Websites, Mobile Apps and the ADA

Categories

  • Business Law
  • Contracts
  • Copyrights
  • Copyrights and Trademarks
  • Employment Law
  • Fair Use
  • Legal Services
  • News
  • Taxes
  • Technology
  • Trademarks
  • Valuations

Areas of Practice

  • Contract Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Employment Law
  • Litigation Management
  • Mergers and Acquisitions

Quick Links

  • FAQs
  • Payment Form
  • Contact Praxis

Company Information

Praxis Legal Solutions LLC

4 Ocean Ave
Ocean Grove, NJ 07756
United States

(732) 988-5362
bburns@praxislegalsolutions.com
Hours:
Mo, Tu, We, Th, Fr: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm

Praxis Legal Solutions - Lawyer & Legal Services in NJraxis Legal Solutions © 2024. All Rights Reserved. | Legal Notice • Sitemap • Privacy Policy

  • Home
  • About
  • Areas of Practice
    • Contract Law
    • Corporate Law
    • Employment Law
    • Litigation Management
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Back
  • Contact Praxis
  • Payment Form

Schedule a consultation with Praxis Legal Solutions

Set an Appointment
* Indicates required fields
:
Sending